Marketing Musings
A visit to Accenture’s website these days is a disorienting experience. The venerable consulting powerhouse has always been a paragon of disciplined branding, but their current web presence is quite obviously in the midst of a rapid overhaul. I’m sure Accenture’s web team had a hurried holiday as they rushed to erase Tiger Woods’ ubiquitous presence from—well, everything.
Suddenly, the images of Woods golfing have been replaced with non sequitur speed-skaters, birds, stock-photo people, or (in one particularly awkward instance) an empty golf course. If I’m recalling correctly, the entire color scheme has also been changed, and the previously cohesive site is generally a little cobbled-together. It doesn’t look awful, and I’m sure it’ll be holistically redesigned and revamped soon, but the contrast with the old site does raise some questions about the dangers of hitching your brand to a star—and what to do when that star falls.
Accenture used Woods so heavily that its public brand became nearly synonymous with his. I can understand why; golf was a perfect extended metaphor for Accenture’s work. The balance of skill, deliberation, data, perspective, and equipment needed to succeed at golf made sense for consulting, staffing, and technology services. Plus, golf has always been shorthand for business leisure. It was a good fit.
But the pairing of Tiger Woods and Accenture had very little to do with his marriage or character. It was about his skill, precision, reliability, and golf’s aesthetic appeal. Was it strictly necessary for them to drop him when he was disgraced? I’m not sure. Here’s what I think their options were:
- Freak out, take down the website, and refuse to answer questions. To their credit, they didn’t attempt this, though I’m sure it was tempting for the first few days.
- Decide to rapidly, deliberately distance themselves from the disgraced golfer. They answered questions clearly and briefly and began the process of overhauling all imagery in advertising materials.
- Ride out the several weeks of media maelstrom with a clear message about the private/professional division. This would have been hard (and gutsy), but given how rapidly the hubbub seems to have settled, it’s possible it could have worked.
What do you think? Did they handle it the only way possible? Where will they go next with the brand? How can brands avoid the pitfalls of star-bound branding?